A
comprehensive literature review using the PICO question described in the last
post will help to reveal if the chosen intervention is beneficial based on the
best available evidence (Everett & Titler, 2006; Hall & Roussel, 2014).
This is a vital step prior to trialing the chosen intervention on a pilot unit (Everett
& Titler, 2006; Hall & Roussel, 2014). Using a team approach to allow
for division of labor will help tremendously by distributing the research
burden but also removes potential selection bias caused by an individual
completing the literature review alone.
When
completing a literature review, the team must identify databases that may
contain research relevant to the EBP project; examples include CINAHL, MEDLINE,
PubMed Clinical Queries, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Scopus, the Cochrane
Library, Joanna Briggs Institute, National Academies, and Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (Hall & Roussel, 2014). Meeting with a research
librarian who specializes in healthcare, nursing, medicine or a field related
to the project may also reveal other relevant resources. Seeking advice from an
EBP expert will also be helpful to identify potential resources.
Once
several databases have been chosen, the research team needs to identify
appropriate search terms and date range (Hall & Roussel, 2014). Starting
the search in PubMed is helpful because it allows researchers to identify Medical
Subject Headings (MeSH®), which is the “National Library of Medicine's
controlled vocabulary thesaurus” (National Library of Medicine [NLM], 2015).
Using MeSH® Terms will most likely generate the most comprehensive search
results because it identifies terms related to the topic (e.g. vitamin C,
ascorbic acid) (NLM, 2015). PubMed also offers tutorials that describe how to
best utilize the database (NLM, 2016).
Many
databases allow the search to be narrowed to a specific date range. This allows
researchers to keep the body of evidence needing review to a manageable level
as well as ensures data used is up-to-date. In general, the team should choose
evidence published in the last five to ten years, depending on the nature of
the project and number of available studies (Hall & Roussel, 2014).
Finally,
there are special considerations for scholarly EBP projects. First, it is
important to choose a phenomenon of interest that gets you excited. Combing a
problem or knowledge focused trigger with a personal passion is vital to carry
you through the arduous process of scholarly writing and research (Everett & Titler, 2006). Secondly, once
you have browsed the literature, write an outline and a concept map, which will
help reveal relationships between concepts (Moran et al., 2014). Setting
achievable goals with deadlines is also paramount for completing the project on
time (Moran et al., 2014; Zaccagnini
& White, 2017).
Finally,
find an EBP champion to mentor you through the process; hopefully this person
can be your scholarly project chair. Make a conscious effort to communicate
regularly with your project chair. Experience writing an undergraduate honors
thesis taught me to give myself extra time to complete a project to allow for
unforeseen barriers that come up along the way. Lastly, do not give up. Expect
detours; that way when they come you have already mentally visualized yourself
successfully navigating through them. YOU CAN do it!
References
Everett,
L. Q., & Titler, M. G. (2006). Making EBP part of clinical practice: The
Iowa Model. In Teaching Evidence-Based
Practice in Nursing (pp. 295-324). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Hall,
H. R., & Roussel, L. (2014). Evidence-based
practice: An integrative approach to research, administration, and practice.
Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Moran, K. J., Burson, R., & Conrad, D. (2014). The Doctor of Nursing Practice scholarly
project: A framework for success. Burlington, Mass: Jones & Bartlett
Learning.
National
Library of Medicine. (2015). Fact sheet:
Medical Subject Headings (MeSH®). Retrieved from https://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/mesh.html
National
Library of Medicine. (2016). PubMed
Tutorial. Retrieved from
https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/disted/pubmedtutorial/cover.html
Zaccagnini, M. E., & White, K. W. (2017). The doctor of nursing practice essentials: A
new model for advanced practice nursing (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones
& Bartlett Learning.